Agency
Definition
Agency in the context of AI-mediated literacy practices refers to the student's capacity to make intentional, informed decisions about how to engage with AI tools. It encompasses:
- Control over the direction and scope of AI interactions
- Choice about when and how to use AI assistance
- Responsibility for evaluating and validating AI outputs
- Authorship in determining what appears in final work
Agency is not about avoiding AI, but about maintaining deliberate control over the collaboration.
Theoretical Foundation
This conceptualization of agency draws from:
- Sociocultural theory - Learners as active constructors of knowledge (Vygotsky, 1978)
- Critical literacy - Agency as resistance to passive consumption (Freire, 1970)
- Human-computer interaction - User agency in automated systems
- Mollick & Mollick (2023) - Students must remain the "human in the loop"
Dimensions of Agency in AI-Literacy Practice
1. Agency over Knowledge Base (Co-Constructing AI Boundaries Framework Component - Inputs)
- Selecting sources that challenge or expand AI's context
- Curating materials that reflect critical perspectives
- Framing problems in ways that resist AI's defaults
2. Agency over Cognitive Task (Co-Constructing AI Boundaries Framework Component - Prompts)
- Crafting complex prompts that demand thinking
- Constraining AI to prevent over-delegation
- Asking for critique, synthesis, or comparison (not just summary)
3. Agency over Output Evaluation (Co-Constructing AI Boundaries Framework Component - Outputs)
- Critically assessing quality and bias
- Recognizing hallucinations or errors
- Deciding what merits trust
4. Agency over Final Product (Co-Constructing AI Boundaries Framework Component - Integration)
- Modifying, transforming, or rejecting AI text
- Maintaining ownership of intellectual work
- Ensuring human voice remains central
5. Metacognitive Agency (Co-Constructing AI Boundaries Framework Component - Reflection)
- Articulating reasons for decisions
- Reflecting on ethical dimensions
- Positioning self as knowledge authority
Indicators of High vs. Low Agency
| Indicator | High Agency | Low Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Prompts | Complex, constraining, directive | Generic, open-ended |
| Integration | Heavy modification/transformation | Copy-paste verbatim |
| Evaluation | Critical assessment, fact-checking | Uncritical acceptance |
| Reflection | Explicit boundary articulation | Minimal metacognition |
| Stance | "I used AI as a tool" | "AI did this for me" |
Agency vs. Delegation
Important distinction:
- Agency = Intentional, bounded delegation with oversight
- Over-delegation = Relinquishing responsibility and critical evaluation
Students with high agency may delegate extensively while maintaining control through prompt design, evaluation, and transformation.
Relationship to Other Concepts
- Boundary-work - Agency is enacted through boundary-setting actions
- Epistemic Stance - Agency reflects how students position themselves as knowers
Evidence in This Study
[Add examples from student data showing high/low agency]
Example: High Agency in Prompts
"Act as a critical reviewer of this argument. Identify logical
fallacies and suggest counterarguments."
(Demands thinking, sets constraints, maintains oversight)
Example: Low Agency in Integration
[AI output inserted verbatim with no modification]
(No transformation, no voice, minimal authorship)
Pedagogical Implications
Fostering agency in AI-literacy requires:
- Explicit instruction in prompt design
- Structured reflection on decision-making
- Emphasis on human responsibility
- Models of critical evaluation
- Practice with modification and transformation
Related Notes
- Analytic Framework for AI Human Meaning-Making Practices
- How learners should engage Large Language Models framework
- Tracing the AI-Human Conversation Framework