Select a result to preview

Digital Literacies Position Statement Development - ILA Collaborative Framework

Overview

The International Literacy Association (ILA) position statement development process represents a critical intersection of research, practice, and advocacy in defining digital literacies for the 21st century. This collaborative brainstorming session captures the complex negotiations involved in creating organizational positions that can guide educational practice, inform policy decisions, and advance equity in literacy education.

The document reveals the iterative and collaborative nature of professional knowledge construction, showing how literacy experts navigate competing priorities, definitional challenges, and practical constraints while working to create documents that will influence educational practice across diverse global contexts.

Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Professional Organizations

The Dynamics of Expert Collaboration

Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives: The brainstorming session demonstrates how diverse expertise converges to address complex educational challenges:

Participant Expertise Areas:

Collaborative Process Characteristics:

Organizational Relevance and Positioning

ILA's Strategic Positioning: The question "how do we keep ILA relevant?" reflects ongoing challenges facing professional organizations in rapidly changing educational landscapes:

Relevance Factors:

Strategic Responses:

Defining Digital Literacies: Operational Framework Development

Core Definitional Elements

Working Definition Evolution: The collaborative development of digital literacies definitions reveals sophisticated understanding of complexity:

Initial Framework: "The knowledge, skills, and capacities that facilitate interaction between the physical and digital contexts"

Key Definitional Components:

Relational Emphasis: "Interactions between each other" where "other is writ broadly as being humans, devices, screens, etc."

This expansive definition acknowledges the complex ecosystem of digital interaction involving:

Global and Contextual Considerations

International Scope Questions: The discussion "how international do you want to be?" highlights tensions between global relevance and local applicability:

Global Considerations:

Local Adaptation Needs:

Educational Environment Analysis

Innovation in Learning Environments

Next-Generation Learning Spaces: The question "what is the next generation of ways that we're thinking about integrating tech" addresses fundamental shifts in educational design:

Physical-Digital Integration:

Pedagogical Innovation:

Contextual Adaptation and Implementation

Mismatch Recognition: The acknowledgment of "mismatch in terms of what we do in our daily use" identifies critical implementation challenges:

Daily Use vs. Educational Integration:

On-Ramp Development: The need to "provide on-ramps to start revolutionizing the ways in which they provide on-boarding" suggests scaffolded implementation strategies:

Equity and Access as Central Framework Elements

Access as Foundational Principle

Equity Integration: The emphasis on "connect to equity and access" demonstrates recognition that digital literacies cannot be separated from social justice concerns:

Access Dimensions:

Systemic Barriers:

Why Questions and Purpose-Driven Implementation

Purpose-Driven Framework: The question "Why? do all of this?" reflects need for clear rationale and compelling vision:

Educational Purposes:

Social Justice Purposes:

Practical Implementation Framework

Best Practices and Evidence-Based Approaches

Framework Application: The discussion of "best practices" and "AUP" (Acceptable Use Policies) reveals tension between innovation and institutional constraints:

Progressive Practice Elements:

Institutional Navigation:

Skills Integration and Application

Core Competency Framework: The "consumption, creation, critical thinking, collaboration" framework provides practical organizational structure:

Consumption Skills:

Creation Skills:

Critical Thinking Skills:

Collaboration Skills:

Contemporary Relevance and Future Directions

Coding and Computational Thinking

Programming as Literacy: The mention of "coding" reflects growing recognition of computational thinking as fundamental literacy:

Computational Thinking Elements:

Educational Integration:

Communication Evolution

Digital Communication Competence: The focus on "how to communicate" acknowledges fundamental changes in communication practices:

Multimodal Communication:

Platform-Specific Communication:

Assessment and Evidence Framework

Framework Development

Structural Approach: The suggestion to "frame the argument, define digital literacy, give five examples" provides systematic approach to position statement construction:

Argument Framework Components:

Example Development Strategy:

Long-term Vision and Organizational Impact

Transformative Educational Change

Revolutionary Potential: The phrase "revolutionizing the ways in which they provide on-boarding" suggests ambitious goals for educational transformation:

Systemic Change Elements:

Excitement and Organic Growth: The emphasis on "exciting, organic, changes teaching and learning" reflects recognition that sustainable change must be intrinsically motivated:

Organic Change Characteristics:

Global Perspective and International Relevance

International Considerations: The question "how international do you want to be?" highlights complex decisions about scope and applicability:

Global Education Challenges:

International Collaboration Opportunities:

Contemporary Relevance and Future Applications

Post-2018 Developments and Continued Relevance

Pandemic Acceleration: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically validated many insights from this 2018 brainstorming session:

Accelerated Digital Adoption:

Ongoing Relevance of Core Questions:

Emerging Technologies and Evolving Frameworks

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: New technologies require expansion of digital literacy frameworks:

AI Literacy Components:

Social Media Evolution: Platform changes require continuous framework adaptation:

Platform Literacy Needs:

Implementation Lessons and Practical Applications

Professional Development Implications

Educator Preparation: The brainstorming session insights inform comprehensive professional development approaches:

Pre-Service Teacher Education:

In-Service Professional Learning:

Policy and Advocacy Applications

Organizational Advocacy: The ILA framework development process provides models for other professional organizations:

Position Statement Development:

Stakeholder Engagement:

Conclusion: Toward Transformative Digital Literacy Education

Collaborative Wisdom: This brainstorming session demonstrates the power of collective expertise in addressing complex educational challenges. The iterative, conversational process of knowledge construction models the kind of collaborative learning that digital literacy education should foster.

Systemic Thinking: The participants' attention to multiple levels—from individual skill development to organizational positioning to international cooperation—illustrates the comprehensive approach needed for meaningful digital literacy education.

Equity-Centered Vision: Throughout the discussion, questions of access, inclusion, and social justice remain central, reflecting recognition that digital literacy cannot be separated from broader concerns about educational equity and democratic participation.

Future-Oriented Framework: While grounded in 2018 conversations, the framework anticipates many challenges and opportunities that have since emerged, demonstrating the value of thoughtful, principle-based approaches that can adapt to changing technological and social contexts.

Practical Idealism: The session balances visionary thinking about educational transformation with practical attention to implementation challenges, constraints, and stakeholder needs. This combination of ambitious goals with realistic planning provides a model for sustainable educational innovation.

As digital technologies continue to evolve and reshape educational possibilities, the foundational questions explored in this collaborative session remain relevant: How do we ensure equitable access to meaningful digital literacy education? How do we balance innovation with inclusion? How do we prepare learners for futures we cannot fully predict while addressing present inequalities and challenges?

The ongoing relevance of these questions underscores the enduring value of collaborative, equity-focused, and evidence-based approaches to educational policy and practice development. The work begun in sessions like this continues to inform efforts to create educational systems that serve all learners effectively in our increasingly digital world.