DL 288

Dark Patterns

Published: May 1, 2021 • 📧 Newsletter

Welcome to Digitally Literate, issue 288. Your go-to source for insightful content on education, technology, and the digital landscape.

🔖 Key Takeaways


Welcome back friends. Thank you to all who regularly (or irregularly) reach out and say hey each week. I value learning how you're doing in your worlds.

This week I published the following:

📺 Watch

As the kids get older, we're able to head out more and go on adventures. What once was a battle to take a walk around the block might soon lead to a family bike ride.

I've been in the market for a mountain bike to rebuild with the kids. The YouTube algorithms brought me the oldshovel channel—part ASMR, part bike repair. It was just the therapy I needed this week.

📚 Read

Facebook Knows It Was Used to Help Incite the Capitol Insurrection

TLDR of the internal report:

The question remains: why did it take an insurrection to prompt this analysis?

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) hosted a workshop on "dark patterns."

The concept, coined by user experience designer Harry Brignull in 2010, describes "deceptive user interfaces."

The FTC seeks to "explore the ways in which user interfaces can have the effect, intentionally or unintentionally, of obscuring, subverting, or impairing consumer autonomy, decision-making, or choice."

This Twitter thread by Yael Eisenstat is an excellent review of questions we should be asking. For more on dark patterns, see this video from The Nerdwriter.

Artificial Intelligence has potential to help children thrive online. AI is being used to track down child predators, help eliminate bias in child welfare cases, and predict which schoolchildren need extra assistance.

But as an exponentially growing field, this technology—if not used ethically and thoughtfully—might hurt a generation of children growing up "shared" in ways adults could never have dreamed when they came of age even a decade ago.

On Social Media, American-Style Free Speech Is Dead

Major platforms' policies aren't actually inspired by the First Amendment. evelyn douek says that's a good thing.

In a new article in Columbia Law Review, she argues the pandemic exposed the hollowness of platforms' claims to American-style free speech absolutism.

"The First Amendment–inflected approach to online speech governance that dominated the early internet no longer holds. Instead, platforms are now firmly in the business of balancing societal interests."

What would we call ourselves if we were not using terms rooted in oppression? What would we do differently?

What would it be like to center health and wellness in our approach to our work with our teams?

🔨 Do

Thankful to Doug Belshaw for sending this along:

  1. Relentless focus
  2. Single task
  3. Boring consistency
  4. No bullshit
  5. No meetings
  6. Follow up
  7. Don't be an asshole

Simple principles. Hard to follow. Worth trying.

🤔 Consider

The internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand.

Dan Kaminsky

Kaminsky's observation about the internet's incomprehensibility connects to this issue's threads—dark patterns designed to manipulate, platforms that can't control the networks they enabled, and AI shaping children in ways we don't fully grasp. We built something we don't understand, and it's shaping us back.

Bonus: Next on the menu...foolproof cacio e pepe.


Previous: DL 287Next: DL 289Archive: 📧 Newsletter

🌱 Connected Concepts: