Federating Your Second Brain

Rewilding Notes into Gardens, Newsletters, and Networks

Reclaim Open 2025 β€’ 30 minutes β€’ Theme: Rewilding the Network – Making New Connections


🌱 Introduction – Rewilding Knowledge Work

What if your notes didn't have to live in a walled garden?

Most personal knowledge management (PKM) systems end up as digital compost heaps: rich, valuable, but locked away in proprietary apps where only you can benefit. We collect, we connect, we curateβ€”but rarely do we cultivate in public.

Rewilding knowledge work means:

The Digital Garden Manifesto

"A garden is not a timeline. It's a topology. Ideas connect to other ideas, not to dates. Gardens are imperfect, always growing, never finished."

Today's journey:

  1. Why federation matters for knowledge workers
  2. What a "federated second brain" actually looks like
  3. How you can start growing your own
  4. Where this all might lead

🌿 From Second Brain β†’ Federated Garden

The Second Brain Trap

The "second brain" metaphor is compelling, but incomplete. Brains are:

What if we evolved the metaphor? What if your second brain could:

What Is a Federated Garden?

A federated digital garden is a personal knowledge space that:

  1. Starts private (your vault, your chaos, your unfinished thoughts)
  2. Grows selectively public (some notes bloom into garden pages)
  3. Connects across platforms (one source β†’ many destinations)
  4. Links bidirectionally (gardens can discover and reference each other)

Key principles:


πŸ’‘ Why This Matters Now: The Balance of Opportunity and Risk

We are at a crossroads where digital growth must be weighed against digital safety. The opportunity is tremendous, but it comes with a new set of responsibilities regarding privacy and data.

1. The Opportunity: Pushing Pause for Growth

My goal in this is to treat knowledge as a living, collaborative process, not a series of finished articles.

Old Mindset (Walled Garden) New Mindset (Federated Garden)
Publishing is Final: Everything must be perfect before hitting "send." Publishing is Pausing: You push a rough idea out to pause your thinking and invite external input.
Knowledge is Isolated: Ideas only connect to other ideas in your private vault. Knowledge is Interwoven: Ideas pollimate across the web via backlinks and feeds, leading to serendipitous discovery.
You Are the Only Editor: Growth is limited by your own expertise and time. The Community Is Your Editor: Feedback instantly fills your knowledge gaps, allowing your thinking to mature faster.

The result: You gain compound interest on your learning. Your notes become searchable, linkable assets that grow faster in the open than they ever could in isolation.

2. The Risks: Guarding Your Garden

Decentralizing your knowledge means you take full responsibility for its security and privacy. The open nature of federation introduces two main risks:

A. Privacy and Security Concerns

Putting notes online, even as "seedlings," requires intentional filtering (Phase 1).

B. AI Scraping and Data Use

Any public text on the web is susceptible to being scraped and ingested by large language models (LLMs) for training purposes.

The Conclusion

The tension between openness for growth and ownership for control defines the Federated Garden. We are moving from a platform-dependent web to a content-dependent web. By controlling the source (your Obsidian vault) and the pipes (RSS/ActivityPub), you choose the balance: you own the data, you choose the risk, and you reap the growth.

I'm hoping to learn from you all how to do that. :)


πŸ› οΈ My Setup / Demo

The Stack

Here's how my federated garden works in practice:

1. Obsidian (The Source of Truth)

2. Digital Garden (The Public Layer)

3. 11ty (Static Site Options)

4. Newsletter Integration (Buttondown)

What I'm trying to figure out:
5. Fediverse Presence (Mastodon / Bluesky)

Reflection question: Where in your current workflow could you push pause and insert a "publish to garden" step?


πŸ’‘ Why This Matters

For You

Compound interest on learning:

Ownership & longevity:

Serendipity:

For the Web

Rebuilding the open web:

Alternative to extractive platforms:

Epistemological diversity:

The Network Effect We Need

Value accrues through links, not likes. A well-tended garden with 50 thoughtful backlinks from other gardens is more valuable than 50,000 followers scrolling past your content.

Reflection question: What would change if you optimized for long-term discoverability instead of next-week engagement?


🀝 Join the Conversation

Let's Build Together

This presentation itself is a living document. After today:

I'd love to hear:

Continue Learning

Dive deeper with the companion guide: Build Your Own Federated Garden


πŸ“š Further Reading

Digital Gardening

IndieWeb & Federation

Tools & Tutorials

Example Gardens Worth Exploring