TLDR 141

Too Long; Didn't Read Issue 141

Published: 2018-03-17 • 📧 Newsletter

Welcome to Issue 141. It's all part and parcel of the ability to adapt.

This week we had a lot of things happening in relation to gun violence in our schools. I spoke at a Save Our Schools rally organized by students on our campus. My piece is available here. You can watch some video on Facebook Live and review some photos of the event. As I have been saying here in TL;DR over the last couple of weeks, I believe that we need to find ways to amplify the voices of our youth.

Here's some other stuff I posted this week:

Please subscribe to make sure this comes to your inbox each week. You can review archives of the newsletter or on Medium.

Say hey with a note at hello@wiobyrne.com or on the socials at wiobyrne.


🔖 Key Takeaways


📺 Watch

I spend (probably too much time thinking about the blockchain and trying to make sense of possible futures. In this video from John Oliver, he explains Bitcoin using $15,000 Beanie Babies and rap videos. As he explains in the intro, Bitcoin is "Everything you don't understand about money combined with everything you don't understand about computers."

I would recommend watching the video to build up background knowledge and get your ideas flowing.


📚 Read

This past week danah boyd presented the keynote at SXSW EDU 2018. The talk is quite nuanced, and I recommend taking the time to read it.

boyd talks about how critical thinking and media literacy efforts are backfiring. She surveys some media literacy programs and sees a simplistic set of assumptions about the way media could and should work in our world. She posits that if we head down this path, the future might look even more chaotic as we learn not to trust anything...even the media.

There has been a lot of great feedback and discussion on this piece since it first posted. I'll have an upcoming response, but want to take the time to read danah's time and let it gel. I'm also enjoying reading the incredible responses.

Did media literacy backfire? by Renee Hobbs indicates that "Media literacy educators, with their focus on evidence and reasoned argument, value expertise even as we point out that expertise is itself a social construction." Benjamin Doxtdator responds that boyd is suggesting that we need to "inoculate" people, but this response fails to address power dynamics in society. Peter Levine pulls all of this together and explores our relationships with "truth" and "reality" as it relates to our information seeking behaviors. Finally, I'd recommend reviewing this response to the criticism from danah.

I know that it's a lot of reading...but I'd be interested in knowing what you think. As I stated...I'll have a response soon.


The Pew Research Center is an excellent accounting of the changes in our behaviors as a result of the Internet and other communication technologies. This week they had two reports that really had me thinking.

The first is this one about audiobook usage by Americans. In my literacy research and education circles, audiobooks and podcasts tend to be things that we all use and consume. Yet, when we think about "real reading" in the classroom...we don't think that audio content counts. I think we need to problematize this thinking.

One of the storylines from this report also suggested that print books continue to be more popular than e-books or audiobooks.

The second report suggest that a quarter of U.S. adults say they are "almost constantly" online. Just let that sink in for a minute.


This post from Sonia Sodha sparked a great discussion between a group of my friends in a Slack channel. The post talks about the value of a university education in relation to the cost of these experiences. Is your degree only worth the paper it's written on? How much of the benefits of a degree come from jumping through a hoop, and how much from the skills you develop?

In our initial discussions, Doug Belshaw and I talked about the possibilities for digital badges, micro-credentials...and of course I brought it to blockchain technologies. We talked about the individual bits of what we wished we had in our educational history...and where we see the future heading.

The incredible Amy Burvall was listening and distilled her thinking into a post replete with many of her original works of art. Burvall suggests that we should focus our curriculum on two elements, philosophy & the arts. She notes that "Philosophy teaches us how to think and the arts teach us how to feel."

I should indicate again that I really appreciate Amy's thinking, and the ways in which she creates and shares her work. This always inspires me to do a better job than relying solely on text for sharing my ideas.


This piece in the NY Times talks about a growing number of elementary and early childhood centers that are seeking to build grit and resiliency by seeking to add risk to the learning environment...as opposed to reducing it.

"Now, Ms. Morris says proudly, 'we have fires, we use knives, saws, different tools,' all used under adult supervision. Indoors, scissors abound, and so do sharp-edged tape dispensers ("they normally only cut themselves once," she says)."


This is one of my favorite posts of the year. The city of Melbourne assigned trees email addresses so citizens could report problems. Instead, people wrote thousands of love letters to their favorite trees. Check out the super cool website for the project.

I've received a lot of great feedback from others as they've enjoyed the post as well. My favorite is from Algot Runeman who shared a small poem in response:

Love letters to trees.
What's next, the bees?
Maybe we'll be one who sees
Nature is not "ours" to squeeze.


🔨 Do

I've had a lot of colleagues talking to me recently about "slow thinking" and the potential benefits. Doug Belshaw shared an overview of this thinking in a post on his Thought Shrapnel site.

Belshaw provides the following overview:

  1. Slow Thought is marked by peripatetic Socratic walks, the face-to-face encounter of Levinas, and Bakhtin's dialogic conversations
  2. Slow Thought creates its own time and place
  3. Slow Thought has no other object than itself
  4. Slow Thought is porous
  5. Slow Thought is playful
  6. Slow Thought is a counter-method, rather than a method, for thinking as it relaxes, releases and liberates thought from its constraints and the trauma of tradition
  7. Slow Thought is deliberate

🤔 Consider

"Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change." — Stephen Hawking


Previous: TLDR 140Next: TLDR 142Archive: 📧 Newsletter

🌱 Connected Concepts:


Part of the 📧 Newsletter archive documenting digital literacy and technology.