TLDR 152

Too Long; Didn't Read Issue 152

Published: 2018-06-01 • 📧 Newsletter

Welcome to Issue 152. The answer machine.

This week I posted the following:


🔖 Key Takeaways


📺 Watch

This short film from Red Giant's Chief Creative Officer, Stu Maschwitz, is a visual homage to the vector arcade games of the 1980s. The aesthetic perfectly captures the glowing line graphics and geometric simplicity of classic games like Battlezone and Tempest while telling a complete narrative within just a few minutes.

What makes this particularly fascinating is the technical execution. Rather than simply applying filters to make footage look retro, the entire piece was constructed using custom code, mathematical algorithms, and painstaking animation work. The behind the scenes video reveals hundreds of hours of coding, math, and animation that went into creating this visual style.

This represents exactly the kind of content that might inspire future digital content creators—demonstrating how technical skills (coding, mathematics, animation) combine with artistic vision to create something unique. It's not just using existing tools but building new tools and techniques to realize a creative concept.


📚 Read

Each year, Mary Meeker, former Morgan Stanley internet analyst and now partner at venture-capital fund Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, delivers her annual internet trends report. This comprehensive overview showcases emerging patterns and possible future trends in technology and internet usage.

Key takeaways from 2018:

These trends reveal a shift from explosive growth to maturation, raising questions about what comes next as we move toward saturation of current technologies and platforms. You can review all of her slides here.


This long read from philosophy professor Dan DeNicola in Aeon challenges the common assumption that we have an unlimited right to believe whatever we want. DeNicola argues that beliefs carry ethical responsibilities—we have obligations to form beliefs carefully and revise them when presented with contrary evidence.

The key insight: "The mind is closed, not open for learning. They might be 'true believers', but they are not believers in the truth."

This distinction matters especially in our current information environment where filter bubbles and echo chambers allow people to construct self-reinforcing belief systems. Epistemic responsibility requires remaining open to evidence and reason rather than treating beliefs as personal property immune to scrutiny.

The argument has particular relevance for digital literacy—part of navigating online information responsibly means recognizing our obligations to truth-seeking rather than just belief-maintaining. It challenges the relativistic notion that all beliefs are equally valid or that holding beliefs is purely a personal choice without broader implications.


For a long period of time, we heard about Google's ambitious project to scan all of the world's books. This began back in 2007 and encountered numerous legal battles and challenges along the way. The story went quiet for several years, leading many to wonder what happened to this massive undertaking.

Amazing things happen when you combine that repository of scanned literature with advanced machine learning engines. Talk to Books represents a new kind of search interface—instead of keyword matching, it uses natural language processing to understand the semantic meaning of questions and find relevant passages from thousands of books that address those questions.

You can ask conversational questions and receive responses pulled from literature, even when the exact words of your question don't appear in the text. This demonstrates evolution toward more sophisticated ways of accessing written knowledge, moving beyond traditional search toward something more like conversation with accumulated human wisdom captured in books.


This webpage serves as an excellent case study for critical evaluation of online information. At first glance, the site looks reputable and would pass most "checklist approaches" for evaluating online content—it has an author name, appears on a psychology website, and covers a topic with scientific framing.

But if you dig deeper, questions emerge: What are the author's credentials and expertise? Where are the references supporting these claims? How does this piece connect to broader scholarly discourse on technology's cognitive effects?

The subject matter itself represents a frequent topic of technopanic as we're still trying to understand what devices and digital media do to our brains. Claims about technology "rewiring" brains or causing various deficits often lack nuanced understanding of neuroplasticity and conflate correlation with causation.

This example illustrates why critical evaluation can't rely solely on surface indicators but requires deeper inquiry into authority, evidence, and context. As misinformation becomes more sophisticated, our evaluation strategies must evolve beyond simple checklists.


A delightful piece of interactive journalism from the Washington Post that details all the parts and pieces that make up a food truck. Beyond the inherent interest for foodies, this represents excellent example of how digital platforms enable new forms of storytelling.

The interactive content allows readers to explore the truck's components, understanding the complexity and ingenuity required to fit a complete commercial kitchen into a mobile vehicle. This kind of visual, interactive explanation would be impossible in print and demonstrates how digital media creates opportunities for richer, more engaging information presentation.

Food trucks themselves represent interesting case study in innovation, constraints, and entrepreneurship—how do you deliver restaurant-quality food from a vehicle with limited space, power, and resources? The solutions reveal creative problem-solving that might inspire thinking about constraints in other contexts.


Bullet Journaling represents analog productivity system in increasingly digital world. The challenge for many is actually maintaining an offline tool and following through with the practice when digital alternatives are always available.

The appeal of bullet journaling lies in its flexibility and tangibility—unlike prescriptive apps or systems, it adapts to your needs and provides physical act of writing and designing spreads. For some, this tactile engagement aids memory and reflection in ways digital tools don't replicate.

The ongoing search for better productivity systems reflects larger questions about how we organize our lives and work, what tools serve us best, and whether analog or digital approaches (or hybrid combinations) work for different people and contexts.

Thanks to Todd Finley and the great Inside Todd's Brain newsletter for this link.


🤔 Consider

"The wise man doesn't give the right answers, he poses the right questions." — Claude Levi-Strauss

For this issue themed "the answer machine," Levi-Strauss's observation about wisdom and questioning provides essential counterpoint. In era of Google, Talk to Books, and AI systems that promise to deliver answers on demand, we risk forgetting that asking good questions matters more than finding quick answers. The anthropologist's insight reminds us that wisdom lies not in accumulating correct responses but in developing capacity to inquire meaningfully—to identify what's worth asking about, to frame questions productively, to recognize when our questions themselves need questioning. Mary Meeker's trends give us answers about internet statistics, but deeper questions emerge: what does saturation mean for digital equity? DeNicola tells us we must be believers in truth not just true believers, raising question of how we cultivate epistemic responsibility. Stoic philosophy helps us ask which aspects of life we can control and which we must accept. The answer machine promises efficiency and access, but the wise approach recognizes that wrestling with questions—sitting with uncertainty, exploring multiple perspectives, refining our inquiries—often matters more than arriving at tidy conclusions.


Previous: TLDR 151Next: TLDR 153Archive: 📧 Newsletter

🌱 Connected Concepts:


Part of the 📧 Newsletter archive documenting digital literacy and technology.