TLDR 22

Too Long; Didn't Read Issue 22

Published: 2015-11-20 • 📧 Newsletter

In TL;DR I'm sharing things that happened during the week in literacy, technology, & education that I think you should know. Please feel free to share with others you believe would benefit. If you like what you see here, I recommend subscribing to get it hand-delivered to your inbox.

To send me feedback, questions, concerns...please email me at wiobyrne@gmail.com or reach out on Twitter. To review past issues please click here. Thanks again for the support. :)

This week I worked on the following:


🔖 Key Takeaways


📺 Watch

A man pulled up a piano using his bike to the front of the Bataclan theater in Paris. He then began to perform the timeless Lennon classic. Read more here.


📚 Read

I understand the abject horror of the circumstances of the Paris attack, and the normal human reaction as we try to make sense of it all. Even with this I'm also a believer in freedom, privacy, security, and the literacies of the web and digital spaces.

Not soon after the Paris attacks, technology was being named as an accomplice in these atrocities.

I do not have all of the answers, and cannot even begin to unpack it in this small block of text. I think that we do need to think deeply about these technologies, and the ways in which we...for better or worse...utilize them.


This text is from the keynote Jennifer Granick gave earlier this month at Black Hat 2015. Video of her keynote is available here. Jennifer is the director of Civil Liberties at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School.

The keynote text and video are excellent. I highly recommend reading through the whole text.

For better or for worse, we've prioritized things like security, online civility, user interface, and intellectual property interests above freedom and openness. The Internet is less open and more centralized. It's more regulated. And increasingly it's less global, and more divided. These trends: centralization, regulation, and globalization are accelerating. And they will define the future of our communications network, unless something dramatic changes.


This post by Sir Michael Barber shares his reflections on what future learning environments should look like...and how do we get there. You can read more guidance about this in a report he helped produce for the Massachusetts DOE.

The teacher is no longer just a transmitter of knowledge, but neither is she or he a mere facilitator. The role is that of an "activator," using John Hattie's evocative term: someone who injects ambition, provokes thought, asks great questions, challenges mediocrity, and brings passion and insight to the task at hand.


Research released this week from the Pew Research Center looks at the use of the Internet as a central resource for Americans looking for work. Yet even with this use of the Internet as a major resource, there is a group of Americans that find it difficult to engage in digital job-seeking behaviors.

These findings point to the need to view technology and the Internet as a literacy.

Some of the key findings include:


This piece from the Wall Street Journal by Lauren Weber examines the role of digital skills and credentials and the job marketplace. Learners are studying, taking courses online, earning digital badges to document their new expertise. Because many employers don't recognize (or understand) these technologies, credentials, and the companies that offer them, these credentials don't carry much weight...for now.

In terms of credentials, and digital badges, I've had three different phone calls over the last two weeks with large organizations in education, training, & job force preparedness programs. In these calls they were picking my brain to get a better understanding of badges, and what opportunities they might offer. There are many people that are far smarter than I in terms of badge understanding.

I agree with Doug Belshaw in that (at least in thinking about badges) we're on the verge of badges becoming a bit more mainstream. My closing comment on each of the calls indicated that I think we're on the verge of something big with badges...and online credentials.


With all of this discussion about what we do correctly and incorrectly online, it's important to remember that we're creating an archive of our digital heritage. It doesn't really depend on whether or not we agree, or fully understand what we're doing...this is all being documented for future generations to pick through.

This post by Kalev Leetaru details the work behind the scenes at the Internet Archive over the last 20 years. It's interesting to look at what...and where content is being archived from.

If you're interested in this topic, I recommend watching this interview with Brewster Kahle on Triangulation. Brewster Kahle is a computer engineer, Internet activist, and digital librarian responsible for maintaining the Internet Archive.


🔨 Do

This post by Jeremy Dean and Katherine Schulten on the NY Times The Learning Network details the power of annotation as we strive to understand and comprehend.

In this they detail the opportunities for digital annotation as you work and learn online. In this they identify three tools that I use and love. Genius's Web Annotator, Diigo, and Hypothesis all offer great opportunities to mark up texts as you read (and now write) online.


🤔 Consider

"Trying to plan for the future without knowing the past is like trying to plant cut flowers." — David Boorstin

A man pulled up a piano using his bike to the front of Bataclan theater, performed Imagine. The timeless Lennon classic in the face of horror. Moments like these remind us what we're protecting, what we're building, what we're documenting.

I understand the abject horror of the Paris attack, the normal human reaction trying to make sense. Even with this I'm also a believer in freedom, privacy, security, literacies of web and digital spaces. Not soon after the attacks, technology was being named as accomplice. I do not have all of the answers, and cannot even begin to unpack it in this small block of text. I think we do need to think deeply about these technologies, the ways in which we—for better or worse—utilize them.

Jennifer Granick's Black Hat keynote on the end of the Internet dream deserves your time. For better or worse, we've prioritized security, online civility, user interface, intellectual property interests above freedom and openness. The Internet is less open and more centralized. It's more regulated. Increasingly less global, more divided. These trends—centralization, regulation, globalization—are accelerating. They will define the future of our communications network, unless something dramatic changes.

Michael Barber on schooling in 2030: the teacher is no longer just transmitter of knowledge, neither mere facilitator. The role is "activator"—someone who injects ambition, provokes thought, asks great questions, challenges mediocrity, brings passion and insight to the task at hand. John Hattie's evocative term captures what we need teachers to become.

Pew findings point to the need to view technology and the Internet as a literacy. Job seeking going mobile, 79% using online resources, but minority of Americans would find it challenging to create professional resume, use email to contact potential employers, fill out job application online. Digital job seeking skills are fundamental, not optional.

Digital badges—I've had three phone calls over last two weeks with large organizations picking my brain. There are many people far smarter than I in terms of badge understanding. I agree with Doug Belshaw: we're on the verge of badges becoming more mainstream. My closing comment on each call: I think we're on the verge of something big with badges and online credentials.

The Internet Archive documenting our digital heritage for future generations to pick through. It doesn't really depend on whether we agree or fully understand what we're doing—this is all being documented. Brewster Kahle maintaining twenty years of Internet history. Creating an archive whether we intend to or not.

Three annotation tools I use and love: Genius, Diigo, Hypothesis. Marking up texts as you read and now write online. The power of annotation as we strive to understand and comprehend.

David Boorstin: trying to plan for the future without knowing the past is like trying to plant cut flowers. We're documenting, archiving, annotating, building—creating the past that future generations will use to plan their future. The question is what philosophies we're embedding in these systems, these archives, these digital spaces.


Previous: TLDR 21Next: TLDR 23Archive: 📧 Newsletter

🌱 Connected Concepts:


Part of the 📧 Newsletter archive documenting digital literacy and technology.