TLDR 87

Too Long; Didn't Read Issue 87

Published: 2017-03-03 • 📧 Newsletter

Welcome to TL;DR Newsletter #87. Each week I'm identifying some of the key things to know from the past week. Thanks for joining us.

This week's issue is about test patterns.

This week I shared the following:

Feel free to share this with someone that you believe would benefit. Please subscribe to this newsletter if you haven't already. Thanks!!! :)

Send me feedback or questions at hello@wiobyrne.com. You can review archives of the newsletter. Check out TL;DR on Medium. Connect with me on Instagram and Snapchat.


🔖 Key Takeaways


📺 Watch

As devices are increasingly connected to the Internet, we need to take some time to think about how this might open up privacy and security issues.

This week it came to light that the Cloud Pets Internet connected talking toy had serious data breaches. This means that as you are sending a voice message to your child, or your child is calling back..your Cloud Pet might also be listening in and slurping up data and discussions from your home.

We need to expect a better understanding of privacy and security from vendors that would like to sell us devices like this.


📚 Read

A post from Jeremy Hsu on Backchannel. The post begins with a look at a post and video from Brad Smith from Microsoft in which they posit the need for a Digital Geneva Convention.

This would create a space for agreements in which governments agree to avoid cyber attacks that target the private sector or infrastructure. This agreement would also try to protect groups that try to hack or steal intellectual property.

As these hacks take place, and governments target businesses and other countries, average citizens are often the ones that get hurt the most.


How to keep messages secure

A great post from Nicole Kobie at Teen Vogue. This post provides clear advice on keeping your messages secure. The piece begins with the premise that you might be at a protest, or concerned about the political leanings of your parents. It goes on to indicate that SMS and Snapchat aren't exactly the safest methods to use and protect your communications.

One of the key apps that they suggest is Signal, which I've discussed here in the past.

I'm excited with some of the recent reporting that Teen Vogue has been sharing. I'm also thrilled to see that they're informing readers to be more critical users of technology.


A fascinating story that unpacks many of the challenges and opportunities involved in research and scholarship. Psychologist Gert Storms indicated that he would no longer review journal submissions for publication if the authors did not supply their data.

This is a test of the Peer Reviewers' Open Initiative (PRO Initiative). This initiative strives for openness and transparency in science and research. The hope is that through the examination of not just the manuscript, but also the data involved, the field can comprehensively review presented materials.

I share much of this thinking as I explore and promote open scholarship in my research. It often requires rethinking issues of privacy and security as we make sure that we protect research subjects while ensuring validity. I also think it's important for researchers to make science and research a bit more understandable and open for all to interpret.


A post from Paula Schwanenflugel and Nancy Knapp in Psychology Today looking at three myths about reading levels and why not to fall for them.

Schwanenflugel and Knapp indicate that we should not be fooled by the following:


As we examine literacy activities, there are some times when "non-traditional" forms of reading and writing are included in instruction. This might include considerations of coding/programming when learning about the writing process. This also may include the use and/or creation of emoji as students engage with texts.

I think this post on emoji being included in a reading test is an example of a Rorschach Test to see how individuals view these discussions and their impact on the classroom. I think the earlier post on open scholarship and publishing is another example of this as it immediately stirs up a reaction to see what philosophical leanings one might have on the topic.

I'm excited to see the inclusion of emoji in these assessments. I think it provides another form of communication that students may use to extend comprehension.


🔨 Do

As I migrate away from Evernote, I've been increasingly using Google Keep to keep track of notes. I use the app on my phone to record audio notes of things that I want to remember. Keep transcribes my voice notes to make it easier to use them. I also save quick notes and ideas in Keep and treat these notes as virtual post-it notes that live in the cloud. As I use these notes, I archive them in case I need it later.

In a recent update, Keep has been added into Google Docs. This allows me to open up a sidebar in a Google Doc, and pull up all of my Keep notes. You can then drag the note over to the Google Doc and it will automatically paste the content into your Google Doc. This is a powerful tool to use in researching and writing.


🤔 Consider

"Existence is random. Has no pattern save what we imagine after staring at it for too long. No meaning save what we choose to impose." — Alan Moore


Previous: TLDR 86Next: TLDR 88Archive: 📧 Newsletter

🌱 Connected Concepts:


Part of the 📧 Newsletter archive documenting digital literacy and technology.