TLDR 120
Too Long; Didn't Read Issue 120
Published: 2017-10-21 • 📧 Newsletter
Welcome all to Issue 120. Considerations of cost, value, and possibly changing the game.
Feel free to share with someone that you believe would benefit. If you haven't already, please subscribe to make sure this comes to your inbox each week. You can review archives of the newsletter or on Medium.
This week I posted the following:
- Sincerity and truth in labeling of online information - This post some of thinking about critical evaluation and making sense of the sincerity of information you read online.
- Video: How you should and could be reading online
Feel free to keep in touch by sending me a note at hello@wiobyrne.com or on the socials at wiobyrne.
🔖 Key Takeaways
- Do You Agree or Disagree: Human nature will take over as the salacious is often sexier than facts. We can also not trust the businesses and industries that develop and facilitate these digital texts and tools to make changes that will significantly improve the situation.
- Beginning to Understand: We're beginning to understand that these tech companies and platforms don't have our best interests at heart. In many aspects, they're giving us what we want...or think we want.
- Survey Indicates: The survey indicates that 98 percent of homes have a mobile device such as a tablet or smartphone. Average time spent on devices by children 8 & under is up to 48 minutes per day in 2017.
- I Agree But Truth: I agree with the results from Alexander and Singer, but think that the truth is far murkier. I think there are ways that we (and our students) should and could be reading on screens. Merely moving print to a screen does not take into account complexities of new tools and practices.
- This Is Something: For those of you that regularly write and blog...Alexander and Singer's publishing strategy is something to pay attention to.
- I'll Start Testing: I'll start testing CheckMark over the remainder of the semester and report back. I'm interested to see if I can build in multiple saved overlays per assignment.
📺 Watch
The NEED for acceptance will make you INVISIBLE - Jim Carrey
This animated short comes from the After Skool YouTube channel.
This voiceover was taken from Jim Carrey's speech at the Maharishi University of Management in 2014.
📚 Read
The future of truth and misinformation online
This new report from the Pew Research Center focuses on expert opinions about the future of trust, truth, and misinformation online. I shared a link out to the survey here in TL;DR months ago.
The results are somewhat split as to whether or not the coming decade will see a reduction in false and misleading narratives online. Review the full report here.
Do you agree or disagree with one of my quotes from the research:
Human nature will take over as the salacious is often sexier than facts. There are multiple information streams, public and private, that spread this information online. We can also not trust the businesses and industries that develop and facilitate these digital texts and tools to make changes that will significantly improve the situation.
Silicon Valley is not your friend
This piece from Noam Cohen in the Sunday Review from the NY Times crystalizes some of the thinking I've had over the past year about social networks and their use. Specifically, we're beginning to understand that these tech companies and platforms don't have our best interests at heart.
I've heard from many colleagues and friends recently that they're thinking about "taking a break" from social media and these networks. I indicate that there is a lot of research (and previous news stories) that suggests that these companies are looking for clicks over our health and welfare. In many aspects, they're giving us what we want...or think we want.
Years ago, many of us that research and write and live in these digital spaces pulled out of Facebook, Twitter, and other spaces. The complaint was that they were playing it "fast and loose" with our digital info and identity. Now, it appears the concerns might be much more dire.
Young children are spending much more time in front of small screens
This post from Anya Kamenetz on NPR Ed shares results from research report released this week from Common Sense Media. Review the full report from Common Sense here.
The survey of parents of children 8 and under suggests that tiny tots are spending a lot of time with tiny screens. The survey indicates that 98 percent of homes have a mobile device such as a tablet or smartphone. Average time spent on devices by children 8 & under is up to 48 minutes per day in 2017.
Other interesting findings:
- 42 percent of young children now have their very own tablet device — up from 7 percent four years ago and less than 1 percent in 2011.
- Screen media use among infants under 2 appears to be trending downward, from 58 minutes a day in 2013 to 42 minutes in 2017.
- Nearly half, 49 percent, of children 8 or under "often or sometimes" use screens in the hour before bedtime, which experts say is bad for sleep habits.
- 42 percent of parents say the TV is on "always" or "most of the time" in their home, whether anyone is watching or not. Research has shown this so-called "background TV" reduces parent-child interaction, which in turn can hurt language development.
Students learn better from books than screens, according to a new study
This week I shared out this research report on my socials and immediately kicked up a bunch of controversy among my online friends and colleagues. You can review the post here on Facebook and review the comments.
The piece from Patricia Alexander and Lauren Singer from the University of Maryland shares research that posits that students prefer and experience learning gains in reading from printed, traditional texts as opposed to screens.
I agree with the results from Alexander and Singer, but think that the truth is far murkier. Part of my response is in the video I linked above. I think there are ways that we (and our students) should and could be reading on screens. Merely moving print to a screen does not take into account complexities of new tools and practices.
On a side note, I'm looking at different places to publish to reach different audiences. I'm paying attention to how Alexander and Singer published their original research, and then published a version of the findings in The Conversation and this was in conjunction with the World Economic Forum. Finally...this was picked up by Business Insider. For those of you that regularly write and blog...this is something to pay attention to.
13 writing tips, from beloved teacher Anne Lamott
Anne Lamott, the presenter of the TED Talk 12 truths I learned from life and writing, shares advice on writing:
- Set your sights small
- Think of your writing as a pond - now go play in it
- There's no shame in hitting the "delete" button
- Your first will stink - and that's OK
- Find a couple of critics you love
- Imagine the book you dream of finding, and then bring it to life
- You'll get so much more out of writing than just a manuscript
- It will probably take some trial and error before you find your voice as a writer
- Don't wait to be "in the mood" to write - unless you want to wait forever
- If all else fails, send Stevo Lamott a letter (pretend to write someone a letter to document your thinking & ideas)
- Waste more time and more paper
- Try to be your own coach
- Think of your writing as a gift to the world
🔨 Do
CheckMark Extension for providing feedback on Google Docs
In my classes I require that students complete and submit their work in Google Docs. This allows me to help them build their use of the tools and platform, while allowing me to make assessment more of a discussion as opposed to a one time event.
The challenge with this is that you often find yourself leaving some of the same feedback and comments for multiple students on their work.
The CheckMark Chrome extension allows you save frequent comments in an overlay and quickly click/add while reviewing. The selections show up as comments on the student work. See a video of it in action here.
I'll start testing it over the remainder of the semester and report back. I'm interested to see if I can build in multiple saved overlays per assignment. What this means is that I could save elements of a rubric that I'm focusing on in my feedback and only have that appear for certain assignments where it is appropriate.
🤔 Consider
"The cost of a thing is the amount of what I call life which is required to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long run." — Henry David Thoreau
🔗 Navigation
Previous: TLDR 119 • Next: TLDR 121 • Archive: 📧 Newsletter
🌱 Connected Concepts:
- Information Futures — Pew expert survey reveals split opinions on whether coming decade will reduce false narratives online, with my contribution noting human nature favors salacious over facts and we can't trust businesses developing digital tools to significantly improve situation, requiring ongoing vigilance about information ecosystem evolution.
- Platform Critique — Noam Cohen crystallizes growing understanding that tech companies don't have users' best interests at heart, with colleagues considering social media breaks as platforms prioritize clicks over health and welfare, escalating from earlier concerns about data privacy to more dire implications for individual autonomy and democratic discourse.
- Children and Screens — Common Sense Media survey shows 98% homes have mobile devices with children 8-and-under averaging 48 minutes daily screentime, 42% owning tablets, 49% using screens before bedtime harming sleep, and 42% homes with constant background TV reducing parent-child interaction and hurting language development.
- Reading on Screens — Alexander and Singer research shows students prefer and learn better from print, but truth is murkier: merely moving print to screen ignores complexities of new tools and practices, requiring intentional strategies for how we and students should/could read digitally, with publishing strategy across The Conversation, WEF, and Business Insider worth noting.
- Digital Pedagogy Tools — CheckMark Chrome extension addresses challenge of leaving same feedback for multiple students in Google Docs by allowing saved comment overlays for quick insertion during review, with potential to build multiple assignment-specific rubric overlays making assessment more conversational than one-time event.
Part of the 📧 Newsletter archive documenting digital literacy and technology.