TLDR 72

Too Long; Didn't Read Issue 72

Published: 2016-11-19 • 📧 Newsletter

Welcome to issue 72 of the TL;DR Newsletter.

In TL;DR we typically discuss events of the week in education, technology, and literacy. In this specific episode, we discuss the development of healthy skepticism.

You can also follow along on Instagram and Snapchat. I'm continuing to share video on my Facebook page and Instagram to test alternative publishing models.

This week I worked on the following:


🔖 Key Takeaways


📺 Watch

A poignant video from the Domics YouTube channel discussing ambition, education, immigration, and points in between. The video (7:40) serves as a modified case study as the illustrator discusses his challenges as he was asked the age old question "what do you want to be when you grow up?"

This week I have students completing video case studies of individuals or groups they studied over the semester. This video provides a possible exemplar for those that want to produce something a bit outside of the norm. I think the video is also a conversation starter for students in secondary/higher ed classrooms.


📚 Read

As we move on from the election results in the U.S., one of the heavy debates online is about the filter bubble and the amount of serendipity we find in online spaces. You can read more about the filter bubble in the post I shared above and in this piece from Molly McHugh.

In these discussions the technology sector is debating how to open up communication lines, and revise algorithms to add more serendipity to the model. This is a delicate balancing act as Facebook and Twitter most of all need you to use their platforms. As a result, they show you things you like to see. If they modify this and show you posts and information that you don't agree with...you'll likely move on.

Molly indicates that "echo chambers" existed long before online social networks and the 2016 election. These could include discussions within your local community, school, playground, water cooler, or the dinner table.

From my perspective the challenge in this is that we focus on modifying code and changing algorithms as opposed to building the "healthy skepticism" of individuals as they read, write, and communicate. In many ways, I saw this happen in prior research on teaching internet comprehension to adolescents. In this work, we found that students would just type a search term into the address bar on the browser. Programmers recognized this was a problem, so they adapted the tool/interface to better suit the user. Now we have programmers at Facebook (and many other platforms) that are revising code and the platform to add some serendipity to the model...but still keep you hooked on your feed.

To wrap up, be aware. Don't believe everything that you read...whether it is online or off. Practice some healthy skepticism as you read, write, and communicate with others.


Meet the professor who's trying to help you steer clear of clickbait

A post from The Chronicle of Higher Ed sharing guidance on media literacy from Melissa Zimdars, an assistant professor of communication at Merrimack College. Melissa shared a list of guidance for critiquing and analyzing online informational texts. Along with the filter bubble and echo chamber that I discussed above, the viral spread of fake news online was viewed as a problem in the recent election.

I should note that I typically do not like "checklist approaches" used for critically evaluating websites. I think that it leads to many errors of oversimplification. I prefer to build up the healthy skepticism in learners as they read, write, and communicate. Of course, this can be a challenge as we identify ways to make this happen. I'll share more in an upcoming post.

Finally, to provide a balanced perspective of the information that I'm presenting, I will also share this post titled "Meet leftist prof who wrote 'hit list' of 'fake' news sites" that I located while researching for this story. Let's see how you develop your healthy skepticism as you read online.


This post from the NY Times discusses some "easy" steps to protect your personal information online. The need for this hit home yesterday as a student in my class all of a sudden realized that she didn't have her cell phone. Under my direction she went to the Android device manager, saw her phone moving on a map, wiped it, and called the police. We all need to do a better job maintaining our privacy and security with these technologies.

The guidance they provide includes:

Please note that some of these steps are a bit challenging, while others take some time. I prefer the post that was shared in the beginning of the NY Times post titled How to encrypt your entire life in less than an hour. I'll have a series of posts over the coming weeks providing more granular advice on how to secure your digital spaces.


An excerpt from The Invent to Learn Guide to Making in the K-3 Classroom: Why, How, and How! by Alice Baggett.

This piece discusses developing the mental dispositions needed as young makers thinker, think, and play. The key is in fostering an active state of mind primed for discovering and not afraid of failures or mistakes. Some of the guidance provided:

Check out this guide of 28 days of hands-on STEM activities for possible projects to tackle with your learners.


Fascinating research examining more than 1,000 pairs of African-American teens and their parents to understand young people's use of computers and the internet out of school. This research was organized by a team that included partnerships between George Mason University and Arizona State University. You can review the full report here.

Interesting trends from the research include:


🔨 Do

A fun game built with machine learning from Google. Basically, you draw, and a neural network tries to guess what you're drawing as you add elements. Please note that as you add elements, the machine is learning all of the time.

This has tremendous possibilities as you have learners quickly sketch out ideas and try to express themselves visually. It also presents opportunities to play with machine learning and have discussions about what is happening as the artificial intelligence (AI) learns from you.

Click here for more AI experiments from Google.


🤔 Consider

"We can talk, and we can listen, if we only give each other a chance." — Gwen Ifill

This week: developing healthy skepticism.

Filter bubble post ILA Literacy Daily how to pop bubble, domain of one's own for pre-service educators research and development digital portfolios. Ambition video Domics illustrator case study - I think the video is also a conversation starter for students in secondary higher ed classrooms. Filter bubble echo chambers existed long before social networks - from my perspective the challenge is we focus on modifying code and algorithms as opposed to building healthy skepticism, practice some healthy skepticism as you read write and communicate. Melissa Zimdars list guidance critiquing online texts fake news - I typically do not like checklist approaches leads to errors of oversimplification, I prefer to build up healthy skepticism, I'll share more in upcoming post. Protecting digital life cover webcam with tape - student realized didn't have cell phone saw phone moving on map wiped it called police, we all need to do better job maintaining privacy and security. Tinkering mindset through making - fostering active state of mind primed for discovering not afraid of failures or mistakes, read stories about mistakes actually make mistakes in front of kids. African-American teens missing out digital innovation fascinating research - use technology to learn create content but far fewer write own code, passion for phones prefer computers for school career. Google Quick Draw neural network - machine is learning all of time, tremendous possibilities sketch out ideas discuss what is happening as AI learns from you.

We can talk, and we can listen, if we only give each other a chance.


Previous: TLDR 71Next: TLDR 73Archive: 📧 Newsletter

🌱 Connected Concepts:


Part of the 📧 Newsletter archive documenting digital literacy and technology.