She Won. They Didn't Just Change the Machines. They Rewired the Election.
Highlights
- Key Argument: The main thesis of the article is centered around how the 2024 election was tampered with through a series of technological manipulations involving key players like Eaton, Palantir, Elon Musk, and others.
- Evidence: The author supports their claims with a detailed timeline of events, partnerships between tech companies, and specific technological vulnerabilities that were exploited to manipulate the election outcome.
- Implications: The findings suggest that the election results were not reflective of genuine voter behavior and raise serious concerns about the integrity of the democratic process.
- Recommendations: The article provides recommendations for state attorneys general and investigators to conduct audits, subpoena communications, and take other actions to ensure transparency and accountability in future elections.
- Conclusion: The author concludes by urging readers to take action against potential election fraud and emphasizes the need for courage in upholding constitutional values.
Suggested Tags
- Election Fraud
- Technology Manipulation
- Voter Integrity
- Tech Giants
- Election Security
How Leonard Leo's 2021 sale of an electronics firm enabled tech giants to subvert the 2024 election.
The Dark Enlightenment Coup
The missing votes uncovered in Smart Electionsâ legal case in Rockland County, New York, are just the tip of the icebergâan iceberg that extends across the swing states and into Texas.
On Monday, an investigatorâs story finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 electionâwithout independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.
These changes were labeled âde minimisââa term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit filesâyet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight.
That revelation is a shock to the public.
But for those whoâve been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isnât the headlineâitâs the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtainâbetween tech giants and Donald Trump.
And it started with a long forgotten sale.
A Power Cord Becomes a Backdoor
In March 2021, Leonard Leoâthe judicial kingmaker behind the modern conservative legal machineâsold a quiet Chicago company by the name of Tripp Lite for $1.65 billion. The buyer: Eaton Corporation, a global power infrastructure conglomerate that just happened to have a partnership with Peter Thielâs Palantir.
To most, Tripp Lite was just a hardware brandâbattery backups, surge protectors, power strips. But in Americaâs elections, Tripp Lite devices were something else entirely.
They are physically connected to ES&S central tabulators and Electionware servers, and Dominion tabulators and central servers across the country. And they arenât dumb devices. They are smart UPS unitsâprogrammable, updatable, and capable of communicating directly with the election system via USB, serial port, or Ethernet.
ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&Sâs Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.
If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environmentâwithout ever modifying certified election software.
In Dominionâs Democracy Suite 5.17, the drivers for these UPS units are listed as âoptionalââmeaning they can be updated remotely without triggering certification requirements or oversight. Optional means unregulated. Unregulated means invisible. And invisible means perfect for infiltration.
A New Purpose for the Partnership
After the Tripp Lite acquisition, Eaton stayed under the radar. But in May 2024, it resurfaced with an announcement that escaped most headlines: Eaton was deepening its partnership with Palantir Technologies.
Letâs be clear, Palantir wasnât brought in for customer service. It was brought in to do what it does best: manage, shape, and secure vast streams of dataâquietly. According to Eatonâs own release, Palantirâs role would include:
- AI-driven oversight of connected infrastructure
- Automated analysis of large datasets
- Andâmost criticallyââsecure erasure of digital footprintsâ
The Digital Janitor:also known as forensic sanitization, it was now being embedded into Eaton-managed hardware connected directly to voting systems. Palantir didnât change the votes. It helped ensure youâd never prove it if someone else did.
BallotProof: The Front-End for Scrubbing Democracy
Enter the ballot scrubbing platform BallotProof. Co-created by Ethan Shaotran, a longtime employee of Elon Musk and current DOGE employee, BallotProof was pitched as a transparency solutionâan app to âverifyâ scanned ballot images and support election integrity.
With Palantir's AI controlling the backend, and BallotProof cleaning the front, only one thing was missing: the signal to go live.
September 2024: Eaton and Musk Make It Official
Then came the final public breadcrumb:
In September 2024, Eaton formally partnered with Elon Musk.
The stated purpose? A vague, forward-looking collaboration focused on âgrid resilienceâ and ânext-generation communications.â
But buried in the partnership documents was this line:
âExploring integration with Starlink's emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity.â
The Activation: Starlink Goes Direct-to-Cell
That signal came on October 30, 2024âjust days before the election, Musk activated 265 brand new low Earth orbit (LEO) V2 Mini satellites, each equipped with Direct-to-Cell (DTC) technology capable of processing, routing, and manipulating real-time data, including voting data, through his satellite network.
DTC doesnât require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible deviceâincluding embedded modems in âair-gappedâ voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.
From that moment on:
- Commands could be sent from orbit
- Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
- Compromised devices could be triggered remotely
This groundbreaking project that should have taken two-plus years to build, was completed in just under ten months.
Elon Musk boasts endlessly about everything heâs launching, building, buyingâor even just thinking aboutâwhether itâs real or not. But he pulls off one of the largest and fastest technological feats in modern day history⊠and says nothing? One might think that was kind of⊠âweird.â
Lasers From Space
According to New York Times reporting, on October 5âjust before Starlinkâs DTC activationâMusk texted a confidant:
âIâm feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.â
Then, an hour later:
âThis isnât something on the chessboard, so theyâll be quite surprised. âLasersâ from space.â
It read like a riddle. In hindsight, it was a blueprint.
Letâs review what was in place:
This wasnât a theory. It was a full-scale operation. A systemic digital occupationâclean, credentialed, and remote-controlled.
The Outcome
Data that makes no statistical sense. A clean sweep in all seven swing states.
The fall of the Blue Wall. Eighty-eight counties flipped redâ not one flipped blue.
Every victory landed just under the threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Donald Trump outperformed expectations in down-ballot races with margins never before seenâwhile Kamala Harris simultaneously underperformed in those exact same areas.
If one were to accept these results at face valueâDonald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon, supposedly outperformed Ronald Reagan. According to the co-founder of the Election Truth Alliance:
âThese anomalies didnât happen nationwide. They didnât even happen across all voting methodsâthis just doesnât reflect human voting behavior.â
They were concentrated.
Targeted.
Specific to swing states and Texasâand specific to Election Day voting.
And the supposed explanation? âHer policies were unpopular.â
Letâs think this through logically. Weâre supposed to believe that in all the battleground states, Democratic voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harrisâs platform that they voted blue down ballot âbut flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket?
Not in early voting.
Not by mail.
With exception to Nevada, only on Election Day.
And only after a certain threshold of ballots had been castâwhere VP Harrisâs numbers begin to diverge from her own party, and Trumpâs suddenly begin to surge. As President Biden would say, âCâmon, man.â
In the world of election data analysis, thereâs a term for that: vote-flipping algorithm.
Billionaires and Tech Giants Pulled Off the Crime of the Century
Why? There wasnât just one reasonâthere were many.
Elon Musk himself hinted at the stakes: he faced the real possibility of a prison sentence if Trump lost. He launched his bid for Twitterâat $20 billion over market valueâjust 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag. But when the ROI is $15 trillion in mineral rights tied to Ukraine losing the war and geopolitical deals Trump could green light, it wasnât a lossâit was leverage.
Itâs no secret Musk was in communication with Putin for over two years. He even granted Starlink access to Russian forces. Thatâs not just profiteering. Thatâs treason.
Then thereâs Peter Thiel and the so-called âbroligarchsââtech billionaires who worship at the altar of shower-avoidant blogger Curtis Yarvin. They casually joke about âhumane genocide for non-producersâ and have long viewed democracy as a nuisance âan obstacle to their vision of hypercapitalism and themselves as the permanent ruling elite.
Well, what is the elimination of Medicaid if not âhumane genocideâ âand does anyone really wonder why his 40-year-old protĂ©gĂ© and political rookie, JD Vance, is Vice President? With this technology in place, if the third-term legislation were to pass, it would hand Vance a minimum of twelve years at the helm of Thielâs regime.
And of course, Donald Trump himself:
He spent a year telling his followers he didnât need their votesâ at one point stating,
â...in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote.â
Trump was facing eighty-eight felony indictments âhe was desperate to avoid conviction and locked in a decades-long alliance with Vladimir Putin. An alliance thatâs now impossible to ignoreâlook no further than his policy trail.
He froze aid to Ukraine and has threatened to place sanctions on them, while planning to lift sanctions off Russia. He openly campaigned for anti-EU candidates, and sided with Russia in multiple key United Nations votes related to the Ukraine conflict.
Letâs be clear:
Donald Trump pledges allegiance to a red, white, and blue flagâ
Itâs just not the American one.
What Happens Now?
We donât need permission to enforce the Constitution. We need courage. While state attorneys general begin their investigations, it only takes one U.S. senator to initiate the disqualification proceedings against the unelected and unfit occupant of the Oval Office.
Action Item:
The ETA has confirmed at least 111,000 malevolent anomalies in Pennsylvaniaâs 2024 election data. Sign the petition demanding a hand-count audit.
State Attorneys General and Investigators:
- Conduct independent audits of UPS firmware on Dominion and ES&S machines
- Subpoena communications between Eaton, Palantir, Starlink employees, and Pro V&V
- Audit Starlink satellite logs for the week of the election
- Freeze uncertified infrastructure updates
- Recount physical ballotsâ by hand
Now theyâre rolling out the same technological toolkit abroadâforcing countries into Starlink contracts in exchange for tariff relief.
The U.S. election wasnât their endgame. It was their litmus test.