Literacy Ethnography and Analysis Project

Overview

This project asks you to conduct an ethnographic study of a community’s literacy practices. You will explore how identity, culture, and communication shape those practices and reflect broader socio-cultural dynamics, with a focus on race, equity, and inclusion (REI). The community you choose can be from your own life, academic discipline, local area, or another context that interests you. This project will allow you to apply course concepts, analyze evidence, and reflect critically on the intersections of literacy, culture, and social justice.


Goals


Steps to Complete the Project

Step 1: Choose a Community or Context

Select a community to study based on your interests. This could include:

Consider choosing a community where you have access to gather observations, conduct interviews, or review related materials.


Step 2: Research and Gather Evidence

Using ethnographic methods, collect evidence about the community’s literacy practices. This evidence can include:


Step 3: Analyze Your Findings

Use course concepts to analyze the evidence you’ve gathered. Questions to guide your analysis include:

Apply relevant theories and frameworks, such as sociolinguistics, critical race theory, or culturally sustaining pedagogy, to deepen your analysis.


Step 4: Reflect and Recommend

Reflect on what you’ve learned and its implications for equity and inclusion in literacy education or practices. Consider:


Step 5: Choose a Format for Your Final Product

Select a format that best conveys your findings and analysis. Options include:


Submission Requirements

Your final product must include:

  1. Introduction: Introduce your community and the focus of your study.

  2. Methodology: Describe how you gathered evidence (e.g., observations, interviews, artifacts).

  3. Findings and Analysis: Present and analyze your findings using course concepts and evidence.

  4. Reflection and Recommendations: Reflect on the implications of your findings and propose actionable steps for equity and inclusion.

  5. References: Cite any sources used (APA format).


Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (90-100%) Proficient (80-89%) Developing (70-79%) Needs Improvement (<70%)
Depth of Analysis (40%) Demonstrates deep insight, connects findings to course concepts and broader themes effectively. Connects findings to course concepts with minor gaps. Limited analysis; connections to concepts are vague. Minimal analysis; lacks connection to course concepts.
Integration of Evidence (30%) Skillfully uses diverse and relevant evidence to support claims. Uses evidence effectively, with minor weaknesses in diversity or relevance. Evidence is limited or inconsistently supports claims. Insufficient or irrelevant evidence provided.
Connection to REI (20%) Thoughtfully analyzes systemic inequities and proposes actionable solutions. Analyzes inequities with some actionable solutions. Limited analysis of inequities; solutions lack depth. Minimal analysis of inequities; no actionable solutions.
Clarity and Creativity (10%) Exceptionally clear, engaging, and creative presentation. Clear and engaging, with some room for improvement. Lacks clarity or creativity; presentation is uneven. Unclear or unengaging; significant issues in presentation.

Example Communities and Topics


Timeline

  1. Week 1-2: Select community and submit proposal (1-2 paragraphs).

  2. Week 3-4: Conduct observations, interviews, and gather artifacts.

  3. Week 5-6: Analyze findings and connect to course concepts.

  4. Week 7: Draft and refine final product.

  5. Week 8: Submit final project and present (if required).


Support and Resources

Let me know if you’d like more examples, or additional clarification!